logo

BRIDGES AND
TUNNELS OF
ALLEGHENY COUNTY,
PENNSYLVANIA

Introduction
List by Location
List by Design
List by Name
List by Use

Search This Site

Article Index

HAER
Smithfield Street Bridge, Pittsburgh, PA

01 Cover Page

02 Foreword

03 Ferries

04 Monongahela
   Bridge 1818

05 Monongahela
   Bridge and
   Fire

06 John Roebling

07 Suspension
   Bridge 1846

08 Table of
   Quantities

09 Suspension
   Bridge Demise

10 Lindenthal
   Recruited

11 Smithfield St
   Bridge 1881

12 Masonry

13 Super-
   structure

14 Channel
   Spans

15 Quality
   of Steel

16 Plate Girder
   Spans

17 Removal
   of Old and
   Erection of
   New Bridge

18 Flooring

19 Ornamental
   Towers and
   Painting

20 Loads and
   Unit Strains

21 Table of
   Quantities

22 Alterations

23 Footnotes

Smithfield Street Bridge, Pittsburgh, PA
Historic American Engineering Record PA-2
page 13

1 : 2 : 3 : 4 : 5 : 6 : 7 : 8 : 9 : 10 : 11 : 12 : 13
14 : 15 : 16 : 17 : 18 : 19 : 20 : 21 : 22 : 23



Superstructure

"The roadway is at present 22 feet 10 inches wide in the clear, and two sidewalks each 10 feet in the clear. The full width of the bridge on the deck spans of approaches is 43 feet 6 inches, and on the channel spans, which are through spans, 48 feet.

"The bridge can be widened out, if ever required, to 64 feet. This made it necessary to erect the present superstructure nearer to the down-stream end of the piers. It detracts much from the appearance of the bridge, which is unsymmetrical at present.

"It was important not to stop travel during the rebuilding of the bridge. Passengers and freights from and to the Pittsburgh and Lake Erie Railroad must pass over it. Besides, there is a heavy traffic in coke, iron and other mill material, which would have been compelled to take a long, roundabout way. The construction of the superstructure had to be arranged to allow of the erection first of one track and then of the other.

"If the new bridge had really been built 15 feet instead of 20 feet higher than the old one there would not have been left height enough near the ends of the channel spans for teams to pass under on the old bridge. It was therefore intended to erect the channel spans about 5 feet higher than their proper grade, and to complete the floor and tracks of the same.

"The pier posts would have temporarily rested on sand jacks, by means of which both spans, weighing about 1600 tons when completed, could have been simultaneously lowered in a few hours to their proper grade. One track and sidewalk on the plate girder approaches on the down-stream side would have been meanwhile prepared for use. In this way travel would have been interrupted only for one day. But this operation became unnecessary when the new grade was raised 20 feet above the old bridge.

1 : 2 : 3 : 4 : 5 : 6 : 7 : 8 : 9 : 10 : 11 : 12 : 13
14 : 15 : 16 : 17 : 18 : 19 : 20 : 21 : 22 : 23



Introduction

Last modified on 30-Sep-99
Design format: copyright 1997-1999 Bruce S. Cridlebaugh
HAER Text: James D. Van Trump, 1974